11 September 2011

Complaint #003: Fantasy Football

Given that today is the first full day of football, I thought this subject would be apropos. A subject of great contention lately (and I may have already complained about it a bit), so I thought I would flesh out all of my issues with it. My focus is going to be on fantasy football, but you can feel free to apply my complaints to any fantasy sport.

First off, football, in and of itself, is exciting enough. Fantasy players always argue that fantasy makes football exciting and packs every game with meaning. I'm sorry, I may be crazy, but what games have you been watching? There is nothing that can compete with Sundays in the fall, and I contend, nothing that can make them more special (as far as football goes). I would argue that, if you can't find excitement in football, you're taking it for granted. But, seeing that excitement is an intangible, subjective quality I will refrain from counting this one against the fantasy players.

But there's plenty more! Fantasy may or may not affect the intrinsic excitement value of a football game, but it certainly can take away the excitement of a game. I won't even refer to the sadness that comes directly from receiving a disappointing performance by a fantasy player on your team. No, for this point, I'll complain about the people who have a fantasy foot ball team. This past week I was talking with someone who had a few friends over to watch the opening game. All of these people were Packers fans, so they should have all been happy that the Packers won the game, right? Um, that would be a "no". It's a "no" because two of these "friends" (I'm putting them in quotes now, because they'd definitely lose some friend points from me) had competing fantasy players: Drew Brees and the Packers defense. That meant that there was someone complaining on every New Orleans offensive play. Not only that, but another "friend" elected to not play Jordy Nelson and so every pass he caught apparently warranted a complaint. Because of this, the person I was talking with, who, as a smart man, does not play fantasy football, had a less than pleasant time watching the game. Let me reiterate: all of these people were Packers fans, the Packers won the game, and no one had a great time.

That brings up another point: the need to cheer for bitter rivals. I'm currently watching the Steelers getting their rears handed to them by the Ravens. The amount of pure, passionate rage that is filling my being right now is overwhelming (luckily, nothing makes you have a good workout run than rage). I would be disgusted at myself if I ever cheered for a Raven to do well. I want them to lose every single game by a million points. I wish poor play on so many teams: the other division rivals: Bengals and Browns, the Patriots, the Raiders, the Jets, the Eagles, the Cowboys, and I'm sure there are many others. As for the other teams, I almost never wish them well as it means the relative quality compared to the Steelers is compromised. I find it disturbing that a Cowboys fan would be happy that he (or she) was able to draft Michael Vick, a Jets fan finds pleasure in getting to draft Tom Brady, a Colts fan would gladly draft Arian Foster, and the list continues.

This also leads to the following situation: cheering for a player of whom your favorite team is facing. Again, I wish the Steelers would win every single game in a thousand-point shutout victory. I would not ever want to give a single yard to an opposing player. Switch over to someone who plays fantasy: "I hope my team (let's say the Packers) wins like 48-42 and Calvin Johnson gets six touchdowns." Certain four-letter words come to mind (and a few others of varying length). And you want to know what I hope? I hope Calvin Johnson does get those six touchdowns and your Packers lose 42-0.

The most questionable aspect of fantasy football doesn't even have to do with the people who choose to participate in it (as much as I question their intelligence and commitment to the integrity of football). What I don't understand the most is the fact that fantasy points are a poor representation of a good football player. From what I hear, Michael Vick had the most fantasy points last season. That I find laughable. I wouldn't have been surprised if Tom Brady, who did phenomenally last year, also had a great fantasy point value last year. And yet, I bet you each of them would, in a heartbeat, trade positions with Aaron Rodgers, heck probably even Ben Roethlisberger. Let me take another few sentences to beat up on Mike Vick: Sure, he had a few impressive performances last season, but the man is not a great QB. First off, he only plays about 11.5 games a year because his bones are apparently made of peanut brittle (that, and the fact that he runs around the field (admittedly, better than any other QB (probably)) risking getting pummeled by Demarcus Ware too many times (also, can you tell that I like stacking parenthetical comments?)). Not only that, but if you do manage to contain him, you can have your way with the Eagles. The Vikings, led by Joe freaking Webb, proved that last season. But enough Vick bashing. He gets more than enough of that from people who are unable of forgiving a man of his sins even after his time has been served, he has apologized, and, so far as we know, he has given up such practices. Fantasy lumps together an entire team's defense, and defense, as we know, is more important than offense (cliché "Offense wins games, defense wins championships" quote here). James Harrison deserves more fantasy points by himself than, I don't know, Rob Bironas (or, insert some other football player here). On top of this, a clutch player gets no recognition. Aaron and Ben, for the postseason they each had, should have gotten mad fantasy points, except fantasy ends just when the season starts to matter. This is probably a good thing, as it would likely ruin an even greater thing than football itself: playoff football.

So excuse me if I don't participate in fantasy football. Excuse me if I have a little less respect for you if you tell me you play fantasy football. I'll just sit back, relax, and enjoy my football. You have fun with your aggravating, incredibly inaccurate representation of the game, but don't come talking to me about it. Also, please don't take me too seriously, I still love you guys (I think) :)

13 comments:

  1. I actually agree with you. Fantasy Football is annoying beause it distracts you from cheering for a team (like the redskins) and makes you cheer for a makeshift team that you create. I did play fantasy football last year only because Ralph had a league and I wanted to make sure he had enough people participate. I never checked on it, and would have like 5 injured players starting out each week lol. However, just some minor things I could argue with you (Sorry I do have to be nit-picky)

    1. Tom Brady is good. I could argue though that Aaron Rodgers is better (and hotter). In fact Im going to say this: A-Rod is better than Tom Brady at quarterbacking.

    2. Vick didnt do anything that warrented all the stigma against him. animals of any kind arent important enough to warrent full rights. If he wasnt black and living in america, what he did would be so unimportant. it would be like bashing a guy that is jaywalking.

    3. outside of what he has done, I think he is a great quarterback and has potential to take the Eagles far.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1. Oh no. Tom Brady's phenomenal. I hate the man as a football player, but you can't fake what he's done.

    2. Listen, I hate PETA as much as the next guy. I probably eat more animals every day than Michael Vick ever torture, but what he did was despicable. He's earned forgiveness, but the act itself was terrible.

    3. We'll see.....again this year

    ReplyDelete
  3. 1. Aaron Rodgers is better.

    2. you are just a product of american culture.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I forgot I was talking to an Eagles fan. Eagles fans are where rational football thinking goes to die, but I'll give in. Aaron has the potential to be as good as Brady. Quantum mechanics teaches us anything is possible, so he might be better than Brady some day. Here's the bar Brady has set (so far): two SB MVP awards, three rings, four SB appearances, a perfect regular season, fifty touchdowns in one season, 358 consecutive attempts without an INT....oh and not only that, he's married to Gisele Bündchen.

    As far as the torturing animals goes: OK, I'll admit "despicable" is probably a bit over the top, but it was wrong. Also, isn't a crazy lefty such as yourself supposed to be yelling that he should be crucified?

    ReplyDelete
  5. 1. the perfect regular season came with the aid of something I would like to call cheating. Also, I think that there are prettier women than Gisele but he should get some credit for that.

    2. I don't appreciate being called a "crazy lefty". I also don't care about any sort of animal rights. It less of a right-left issue and more of a people-animal issue. The only people who care about animals rights are people who actually see animals on the same level as us. I, on the other hand, do not.

    ReplyDelete
  6. 1. I find the most fascinating thing about Gisele is that she's a billionaire. She's worth more than Brady who has been the NFL's poster boy for a decade. No, she isn't the most beautiful woman on the planet, but she's definitely up there. Let's just say, I wouldn't mind her stopping by my way.

    2. Sorry, I didn't mean it to be incredibly insulting. I'm starting to lean left myself (I'm still closer to the center than pretty much anyone). I don't see animals on the same level as humans (they aren't capable of love or reason, two things I highly value in humans when they display them), but there is something to be said about someone who tortures animals. Even if there weren't laws prohibiting it, I doubt you'd go out killing puppies. Plus, they're so cute :)

    ReplyDelete
  7. 1. yea she is pretty rich. I would prefer to have her wealth.

    2. I kinda prefer cats on the who-is-cuter debate. I mean, they purr. how adorable. Nothing though will be as cute as babies :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. 2. Did you mean "what-is-cuter"? And what about chipmunks? They're really cute. Link to adorable chipmunk in slow motion

    ReplyDelete
  9. naw I prefer (in order)
    1. babies
    2. cats
    3. puppies (not full fledge dogs)
    anything else I really couldnt care for.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Well, getting back to the topic of fantasy football...

    1. While football games are exciting, they are really only exciting when you care about them. Sure watching your favorite team is exciting in and of itself but what about the two worst teams battling for who is second last? Sometimes people even want their team to lose so that they have a better draft pick. This is a part of real football, not even fantasy. I would say that while it probably can't enhance the excitement of a game you already like, it can broaden your excitement to include games you normally wouldn't care about.

    2. You can find people who complain about every play anywhere. With 4 Packers fans rooting on the Packers, someone is going to complain on every down about how it wasn't executed properly. I've seen fans critisize a throw that was caught and turned into a touchdown, just because the throw wasn't perfect.

    3. As for fantasy creating disharmony between your favorite team and your fantasy players, it comes down to the person. Fantasy shouldn't be blamed for a person not having dedication to their team. Really it is just a sifter to see who is a true advocate and who isn't. I've had talks with Tim and he always wants the Steelers to win no matter who he has playing against him.

    4. Defenses are confusing to remember. It is a nice draw to fantasy sports having them all grouped together so as not to be daunting. I wouldn't be against there being advanced leagues where everyone had to be chosen on your fantasy team, but for people new to football it would just turn them off.

    And that is my main point. Fantasy football is an amazing way to draw non-football fans into the sport. I knew nothing about football, but when I started doing fantasy I started caring and keeping up with what was happening. Anyways, there's my two cents from someone who likes fantasy football.

    Joseph L

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hey, hey, hey it's Joseph. Nice to see that more than one person reads these things (unless yu just read this one, haha)

    1. I do agree that the strong point fantasy football players have is that it can make a terrible game a bit more exciting (what other reason would we be interested in a Seahawks-Cardinals game?)

    2. Unfortunately true, but I don't think we need to be adding to this.

    3. And a true fan should always be cheering for their team. I guess fantasy is a way of separating the wheat (people who are dedicated to their team) and the chaff (people whose focus isn't solely on their team). Admittedly, I'm torn by some games each week because I pick the winners of the games each week (Buffalo winning last week was awesome, but I lost a few points in my predictor pool, making me a complete hypocrite because I should find nothing negative about the Bills beating the (ugh) Patriots)

    4.a. I think this is more a result of the fact that the league is much more offensive friendly because offense is more entertaining. As a Steelers fan, I much more care about my defense. I don't find it difficult to remember Polamalu, Clark, Harrison, Woodley, Keisel, Smith, Hampton, Farrior, Timmons, Taylor and McFadden.

    4.b. You bring up a point I hadn't considered, though. I never really thought about the people who aren't big football fans. I guess fantasy is a good introduction to the players for them.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Will, I haven't had the time to actually craft a good response to this post, but Joe covered a lot of good points that would have been in my outstanding argument.

    And, he also mentioned me in his response, which I believe entitles him to a few thousand imaginary points in this debate! :)

    ReplyDelete
  13. I think it's about time I start joining this blog. I enjoy fantasy because it keeps me up to date with stats in sports. Also, it's pretty much the closest thing one will have to owning a professional team and as a manager you want the best from each player and to win each week (especially if there is money on the line).

    Ralph M.

    ReplyDelete