Let me first point out that the Pharisees are not simply a group of people from biblical times, but, rather, Pharisaic thought continues to plague people even into the present, and it may lurking in places that we wouldn't have expected it.
If there's one thing you learn about Pharisees in church, it's that Jesus wasn't really a fan. Now Jesus is a pretty smart dude, so he probably had a good reason for this. So, let's investigate: Matthew 23:2-3a - Jesus says, "The teachers of the law and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat. So you must be careful to do everything they tell you…" Apparently, the Pharisees were incredibly religiously intelligent people. And you say "But Will, you just told me that Jesus was less than supportive of the Pharisees. He's praising them!" which is why I made sure to add the ellipsis at the end of that quote. If you've been to any significant amount of church services, you probably know why. Well, let's dig a little deeper: Matthew 23:3b - "…But do not do what they do, for they do not practice what they preach." Ahh, there it is: they're hypocrites. If you read around, you get a sense of the Pharisees' lifestyle: they are religious in public and make themselves known because of it and they ridicule anyone who doesn't live this way. So what we should take away from this is that we should not act like a Pharisee (even if you do heed their spoken advice on how to live).
But you didn't come here to let me give you a (less than fulfilling) Bible lesson. No, you're here because you saw my post on Facebook or Twitter or something, know how awesome my posts have been in the past, and decided to waste time reading this rather than doing something more constructive. Ok, the second part probably isn't entirely accurate, but I digress. You came here to hear me complain, and so I will. Smart Christian people should know pretty much everything I stated in my previous paragraph. Therefore, no smart Christian people should act like Pharisees, right? Now, I'm not qualified to judge the intelligence of the Christian community, so I'm going to assume there are enough intelligent people in the societal Christian church to make my point valid. (I should probably take this moment to address the fact that I make a good number of remarks about "the societal Christian church". Yes, I am making wide generalizations, but as we all know, wide generalizations are almost always accurate to the group as a whole and only have problems when applied to individuals or small groups within the larger group. I'll play the percentages and make a wide generalization. Also, please note that a majority of the real Christians I know are not part of the societal Christian church, but rather only a part of the true Christian church. Unfortunately, the societal church is what society sees as the Christian church.)
OK, back on topic: Christians shouldn't act like Pharisees. This will be shocking: I am complaining because they do. I think the very fact that I can refer to the "societal Christian church" and you know what I am talking about speaks to the fact that it is too loud in acting religious and not being religious. This, however, is not my main contention. If people want to hurt themselves, I'll warn against it, but I get angry when people try to negatively affect others. This is where I'm going to get the angry comments, from both sides. And I say, bring it on! But please do read the entire post before yelling at me.
There is a hierarchy of sins in the church (not in the Bible, just in the church). For some reason, committing homosexual acts is right near the top, maybe just under rape and murder. Abortion is tied with murder. Pride and using the LORD's name in vain are pretty low. Some acts, that aren't sins intrinsically like using certain four-letter words or sleeping in the same house (maybe even the same bed) as someone who isn't your spouse, somehow make the list. The first point regarding this needs to be that all sins are equal in the eyes of God. All sins separate us from God. Look at it this way: it's kind of like points in a football game. In the eyes of humans you either lost the game by three points (for pride) or 45 points (for rape). In the eyes of God, you lost the game. Luckily, He provides us with a infinite-point opportunity to win the game, if we just accept it.
One thing Christians should know is that all people sin. It is in our nature. For some reason, we, as humans, act like humans and we sin. I do believe that the following are sinful acts: murder, rape, pride, using God's name in vain, abortion, homosexual acts, using those four-letter words in a hurtful way (admittedly, this is often the case), sleeping with that person who isn't your spouse if it causes either of you to struggle sexually (admittedly, this is often the case). The interesting point, however, is that the above point system apparently applies to heaven or the church building. If you're losing by more than ten points, there's no way you make it to heaven and we don't like you stepping into our church building. It's for nice, quietly sinful people. You know, on the level of pride. This is all well and good in the human point system. Heck, it's downright logical. But the viewpoint that counts is God's. He just sees everyone as sinful and accepts those who love Him despite themselves.
This comes as a shock to some Christians. There are gays and murderers and rapists in heaven. This comes as a shock because apparently these people don't read their Bibles. Paul, who wrote like half of the New Testament, murdered Christians because they were Christians. He is in heaven (or I'm hedging my bets that he is). David, who had sex with another man's wife and then killed said man to cover his own steps, is in heaven. Rahab, a prostitute, is in heaven. Another prostitute, the woman of the passage Luke 7:36-50, is told by Jesus that she is saved. And with whom is He sitting? A Pharisee. A Pharisee who He says may be forgiven, but is filled with little love.
It is because of this, I believe, we are told not to judge. Not only do we have no authority, but we'd get it wrong. The murderers and prostitutes would go to hell and the people with little love would go to heaven, and they'd all be arguing who is more righteous and what everyone else was doing incorrectly. That being said, I'll leave the job up to God.
1. I like this post. I do agree that society tends to place more emphasis on certain sins (while they break other rules). when you wrote this post i immediately thought of the conservatives in our american political system. They talk the talk very loudly and yet do some very shameful things.
ReplyDelete2. It also made me think of the "holier than thou" christians. it is usually the evangelicals who are like this (and im even including Northway in this because they are an evangelical church. In fact, Campus Crusade For Christ is regarding as one of the most famous Evangelical groups in America. My textbook for a class mentioned it too). I dont want to say i have a huge problem with both Northway and Cru as I am amember of Northway and I know good ppl that continue to go to Cru (I wont anymore for personal reasons) But i digress...this is usually an evangelical problem i think more than any other chrisitan group. And i would say that evangelical christians are usually the type that ppl label as "the societal christian church".
3. sleeping in the same house as someone other than your spouse is a sin? oops. college has me fail that one. Espeically now cuz im living with a male.
4. this is more of a sidenote but as I learned christian history, it was really interesting to think about who got final say over what is included in the Bible. there are other scriptures from people (even the same people that wrote other stuff that made it into the Bible) that compliment other scriptures, and yet are not included in the Bible. Is there more that God wants us to know that is being kept away from us? Where does authority for what is sinful come from really?
1. Yes the hyper-religious conservatives are usually big examples of this post. This doesn't mean liberals are rational, even in comparison. "If you're on the far right or the far left, do you know what you've done? You've gone too far."
ReplyDelete2. I find it funny (and by that I mean depressing) we can use "holier than thou" and Christians in the same sentence. Some people didn't get the "first shall be last, and the last first" message. I will disagree about evangelicals. Yes, the groups that are labelled "evangelical" are usually guilty, but we are called to evangelize, so all Christians should be "evangelical".
3. According to a large portion of the church that I know. Sorry, you're going to hell now. It's like a minus 23 and that's way more than a field goal.
4. I never understood the point of people who bring this up. It's the same thing as the people who say "the Bible was written thousands of years ago, how can it survive so much translation and really be the word of God?". A person is of two schools of thought: either the Bible is not the word of God, in which case it doesn't matter, or it is the word of God, and He would preserve it as He means for us to read it.
2. I understand what you are saying about evangelicalism but tere is a distinctions within protestant christianity on evangelical christianity and other groups (calvinist, lutherans,baptists, etc). the evangelical chirch makes Proselytizing their main priority (in fact, when evangelicalism was first born during the Great Awakening, they founded themselves as people who wanted the speratioon of church and state. Fun fact.) ask a baptist or someone else, they would make their number one goal something else.
ReplyDelete3. well your church must be filled with rich people. that never went to college.
4. i think those are two different issues: translation and selection. tranlsation leads more to quesitons of what things really mean (i.e. immaculate conception vs. virgin meaning young girl and thats all- what hebrew words mean) and selection questions more the human aspect of the Bible.
2. Well that's where the difference comes in. True, those labelled "Evangelicals" are usually proselytizers. We are called to be evangelical not proselytic.
ReplyDelete3. My family has never been rich and plenty of people who've gone to the churches I've attended went to college, but it's always been quite taboo from what I know.
4. But both are subject to my counterpoint. Both question the integrity/inerrancy/completeness of the Word of God.
2. so then what is your definition of evangelic vs proselytism.
ReplyDelete3. well i think that it really depends. I can see living with a boyfriend being seen as taboo but even so there is usually economic reasons for that. I think that saying that doing something like that is taboo is more judgemental than anything.
4. They question the role of the people in the Bible.
2. It like the difference between people asking for money and panhandling. Evangelism is telling people about your religion. Proselytizing is being pushy or forcing someone into it. Not much good comes from the latter.
ReplyDelete3. And if the societal church isn't anything, they're certainly not judgmental ;)
4. Are you talking about people who question translation? They question the people who've handled the text for 2000+ years. Much like the people who handled the text at the Council of Nicaea. Translation is every bit as individualized as selection (if the literature classes I took in college know anything about translation).
2. ah i see where you are coming from. I was speaking more to how the general public has historically understood the evangelicalism.
ReplyDelete3. LOL.
4. true. didnt the council of nicaea focus more on what the official belief of the christian church would be going foward?
5. on an unrelated note: Cru has become extra clique-y lately
4. I believe, within that, they established the Biblical canon.
ReplyDelete5. I shouldn't comment on this, but it's (unfortunately) not very surprising. It isn't an entirely bad thing, people finding others with the same interests definitely helps build deeper relationships with others, but it definitely negatively impacts church community unity. There's a tough balance to it, Cru's not perfect (no group is).
5. sorry if i put you in a spot you didn't want to be in
ReplyDelete